[webkit-reviews] review granted: [Bug 202187] [JSC] Date functions should have intrinsic : [Attachment 382275] Patch
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
Wed Oct 30 16:34:39 PDT 2019
Keith Miller <keith_miller at apple.com> has granted Yusuke Suzuki
<ysuzuki at apple.com>'s request for review:
Bug 202187: [JSC] Date functions should have intrinsic
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=202187
Attachment 382275: Patch
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=382275&action=review
--- Comment #11 from Keith Miller <keith_miller at apple.com> ---
Comment on attachment 382275
--> https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=382275
Patch
View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=382275&action=review
r=me with comments.
> Source/JavaScriptCore/dfg/DFGAbstractInterpreterInlines.h:4072
> + setNonCellTypeForNode(node, SpecBytecodeNumber);
Can say this is SpecInt32Only | SpecDoublePureNaN instead of
SpecBytecodeNumber?
> Source/JavaScriptCore/dfg/DFGByteCodeParser.cpp:3203
> + setResult(addToGraph(DateGetMachineDouble, OpInfo(intrinsic),
OpInfo(), base));
Can we rename this to date get time?
> Source/JavaScriptCore/dfg/DFGByteCodeParser.cpp:3229
> + setResult(addToGraph(DateGetJSNumber, OpInfo(intrinsic),
OpInfo(prediction), base));
Hmm, can we rename this to DateGetInt32OrNaN? This implies that it can return
any JSNumber but it can only vend an int32 or NaN.
> Source/JavaScriptCore/dfg/DFGSpeculativeJIT.cpp:14029
> +
Please remove.
More information about the webkit-reviews
mailing list