[webkit-reviews] review granted: [Bug 181079] navigator.onLine does not work inside service workers : [Attachment 330545] Patch
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
Sun Jan 7 22:54:04 PST 2018
Darin Adler <darin at apple.com> has granted youenn fablet <youennf at gmail.com>'s
request for review:
Bug 181079: navigator.onLine does not work inside service workers
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181079
Attachment 330545: Patch
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=330545&action=review
--- Comment #10 from Darin Adler <darin at apple.com> ---
Comment on attachment 330545
--> https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=330545
Patch
View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=330545&action=review
> Source/WebCore/testing/ServiceWorkerInternals.h:37
> + static Ref<ServiceWorkerInternals> create(ServiceWorkerIdentifier
identifier) { return adoptRef(*new ServiceWorkerInternals { identifier }); }
For new classes I suggest having the create functions not be inlined; the
constructor can be inlined in the create function, which seems better to me.
> Source/WebCore/testing/js/WebCoreTestSupport.cpp:196
> + auto* execState = globalScope.execState();
In new WebCore code I would suggest:
auto& state = *globalScope.execState();
Over time we we always be using references for this, not pointers.
> Source/WebCore/workers/service/context/ServiceWorkerThreadProxy.cpp:101
> + auto addResult = allServiceWorkerThreadProxies().add(this);
> + ASSERT_UNUSED(addResult, addResult.isNewEntry);
Since this is for debugging only, maybe assert !contains and do the assertion
before the add rather than using the add result?
> Source/WebCore/workers/service/context/ServiceWorkerThreadProxy.cpp:112
> + allServiceWorkerThreadProxies().remove(this);
Maybe assert contains here?
> Source/WebCore/workers/service/context/ServiceWorkerThreadProxy.h:69
> + // Public only for testing purposes.
> + WEBCORE_EXPORT void notifyNetworkStateChange(bool isOnline);
Is this what WEBCORE_TESTSUPPORT_EXPORT is for? Or is that something else?
More information about the webkit-reviews
mailing list