[webkit-reviews] review granted: [Bug 179941] [Web Animations] Adopt KeyframeList in KeyframeEffect : [Attachment 327450] Patch
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
Wed Nov 22 09:44:54 PST 2017
Darin Adler <darin at apple.com> has granted Antoine Quint <graouts at apple.com>'s
request for review:
Bug 179941: [Web Animations] Adopt KeyframeList in KeyframeEffect
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=179941
Attachment 327450: Patch
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=327450&action=review
--- Comment #3 from Darin Adler <darin at apple.com> ---
Comment on attachment 327450
--> https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=327450
Patch
View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=327450&action=review
> Source/WebCore/animation/KeyframeEffect.cpp:54
> + , m_keyframes("")
empytString() is more efficient than writing ""
> Source/WebCore/animation/KeyframeEffect.cpp:78
> + KeyframeList newKeyframes("keyframe-effect-" +
createCanonicalUUIDString());
> + newKeyframes.clear();
Seems annoying to have to construct this with two values, and then clear them
out. Is there a more elegant construction we can come up with?
> Source/WebCore/animation/KeyframeEffect.cpp:127
> - m_keyframes = WTFMove(newKeyframes);
> + m_keyframes.swap(newKeyframes);
This seems unnecessary. Seems like KeyFrameList could and should easily support
move assignment since AtomicString, Vector, and HashSet all support that.
> Source/WebCore/rendering/style/KeyframeList.h:81
> + void swap(KeyframeList& other)
> + {
> + std::swap(m_animationName, other.m_animationName);
> + std::swap(m_keyframes, other.m_keyframes);
> + std::swap(m_properties, other.m_properties);
> + }
Should just add the move assignment operator instead:
KeyFrameList& operator=(KeyFrameList&&) = default;
But also, why doesn’t that get generated automatically for us?
More information about the webkit-reviews
mailing list