[webkit-reviews] review granted: [Bug 136907] Text laid out with the SVG -> OTF font converter does not have the same metrics as with the SVG font code path : [Attachment 238287] Patch
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
Thu Sep 18 09:32:24 PDT 2014
Darin Adler <darin at apple.com> has granted Myles C. Maxfield
<mmaxfield at apple.com>'s request for review:
Bug 136907: Text laid out with the SVG -> OTF font converter does not have the
same metrics as with the SVG font code path
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136907
Attachment 238287: Patch
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=238287&action=review
------- Additional Comments from Darin Adler <darin at apple.com>
View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=238287&action=review
> Source/WebCore/svg/SVGToOTFFontConversion.cpp:221
> + // If the font parser sees an ascent or descent of 0, it thinks that
something
> + // bad happened and takes a different path. We want it to believe us.
> + if (!ascent)
> + ascent = 1;
> + if (!descent)
> + descent = 1;
Nothing in this comment makes it clear why “1” is a suitable value to use
instead of 0. Also “want it to believe us” is a vague comment. It would be more
useful to say something brief and clear about how specifying a 1 FUnit value
gives us the behavior we want.
> Source/WebCore/svg/SVGToOTFFontConversion.cpp:226
> + // WebKit's SVG codepath hardcodes the line gap to be 1/10th of the font
size (see SVGFontData.cpp). We should match that.
This comment is missing the “why”. Why should we match that?
> Source/WebCore/svg/SVGToOTFFontConversion.cpp:683
> + if (!advanceAttribute.isEmpty()) {
Why the special case for the empty string? The code would do the right thing
without a special case and I’d like this code better without a local variable
for advanceAttribute.
> Source/WebCore/svg/SVGToOTFFontConversion.cpp:702
> auto& advanceAttribute =
glyph.fastGetAttribute(SVGNames::horiz_adv_xAttr);
This code has the same issues as the copied/pasted version of it that I
commented on above.
More information about the webkit-reviews
mailing list