[webkit-reviews] review denied: [Bug 111986] [EFL] accessibility/aria-invalid is failing : [Attachment 212339] Patch
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
Mon Sep 23 04:00:25 PDT 2013
Mario Sanchez Prada <mario at webkit.org> has denied Krzysztof Czech
<k.czech at samsung.com>'s request for review:
Bug 111986: [EFL] accessibility/aria-invalid is failing
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111986
Attachment 212339: Patch
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=212339&action=review
------- Additional Comments from Mario Sanchez Prada <mario at webkit.org>
View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=212339&action=review
> Tools/DumpRenderTree/atk/AccessibilityCallbacksAtk.cpp:131
> +#elif PLATFORM(EFL) && HAVE(ACCESSIBILITY)
The whole content of this file is wrapper inside an HAVE(ACCESSIBILITY) guard,
so you don't need to add it explicitly here.
> Tools/DumpRenderTree/atk/AccessibilityCallbacksAtk.cpp:232
> +#elif PLATFORM(EFL) && HAVE(ACCESSIBILITY)
Same here
> Tools/DumpRenderTree/atk/AccessibilityCallbacksAtk.cpp:266
> +#elif PLATFORM(EFL) && HAVE(ACCESSIBILITY)
And here :)
>
Tools/WebKitTestRunner/InjectedBundle/atk/AccessibilityNotificationHandlerAtk.c
pp:116
> +#if PLATFORM(GTK) || (PLATFORM(EFL) && HAVE(ACCESSIBILITY))
In this case is different because this file is not guarded at all as the other
ones.
Perhaps we should do it here too? After all, this file does not make much sense
at all if you don't have accessibility enabled, does it? :)
More information about the webkit-reviews
mailing list