[webkit-reviews] review granted: [Bug 86307] Simplify SourceProvider's subclasses : [Attachment 141591] Patch
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
Sun May 13 15:59:58 PDT 2012
Darin Adler <darin at apple.com> has granted Benjamin Poulain
<benjamin at webkit.org>'s request for review:
Bug 86307: Simplify SourceProvider's subclasses
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86307
Attachment 141591: Patch
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=141591&action=review
------- Additional Comments from Darin Adler <darin at apple.com>
View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=141591&action=review
This is OK as-is, but we might be able to do a bit better.
> Source/JavaScriptCore/parser/SourceProvider.h:61
> + const StringImpl* data() const
> + {
> + return stringImpl();
> + }
Why not leave this as a pure virtual function and call it instead of adding a
new stringImpl() function? Or maybe this could all be done with the source()
function? I am unclear on why there need to be three different functions that
all return the source string.
Also, all the callers seem to be calling impl() so maybe this should return a
const UString& or const String&. That would be one way of saving a bit of
reference count churn in the getRange function. I guess the source() function
already works that way.
> Source/JavaScriptCore/parser/SourceProvider.h:65
> + int length = end - start;
Why a local variable for this? Doesn’t seem better than just saying end - start
in the function call.
> Source/JavaScriptCore/parser/SourceProvider.h:66
> + return UString(stringImpl()).substringSharingImpl(start,
length);
Would be nice to add a version of substringSharingImpl that works directly on a
StringImpl* so we don’t have to churn the reference count an extra time each
time this function is called.
> Source/JavaScriptCore/parser/SourceProvider.h:72
> + StringImpl* impl = stringImpl();
> + return impl ? impl->length() : 0;
There must be a better name than “impl” for this. Maybe “data” or “string”.
Words are better than word fragments.
More information about the webkit-reviews
mailing list