[webkit-qt] New module "qtwebrtc": WebRTC support for QtWebkit and native apps

[Igor Borovkov]

Hi Andrea, Simon,

thank you for your responses.

Please don't get me wrong, I'd rather avoid adding new layers,
but in this case, we started to consider a new module because (libjingle is
basically a big collection of libraries)
we didn't want to pollute Qtwebkit project with lots of dependencies needed
to bring WebRTC support through libjingle.

Partial list of libjingle libraries and their dependencies needed for
WebRTC is below

    -laudio_coding_module \
    -laudio_conference_mixer \
    -laudio_device \
    -laudio_processing \
    -laudio_processing_sse2 \
    -lbitrate_controller \
    -lCNG \
    -lcommon_video \
    -lG711 \
    -lG722 \
    -lgenperf_libs \
    -liLBC \
    -liSAC \
    -liSACFix \
    -ljingle \
    -ljingle_p2p \
    -ljingle_peerconnection \
    -ljpeg_turbo \
    -ljsoncpp \
    -lmedia_file \
    -lNetEq \
    -lopus \
    -lpaced_sender \
    -lPCM16B \
    -lremote_bitrate_estimator \
    -lresampler \
    -lrtp_rtcp \
    -lsignal_processing \
    -lsrtp \
    -lsystem_wrappers \
    -ludp_transport \
    -lvad \
    -lvideo_capture_module \
    -lvideo_engine_core \
    -lvideo_processing \
    -lvideo_processing_sse2 \
    -lvideo_render_module \
    -lvoice_engine_core \
    -lvpx \
    -lvpx_asm_offsets \
    -lvpx_asm_offsets_vp9 \
    -lvpx_intrinsics \
    -lwebrtc_i420 \
    -lwebrtc_opus \
    -lwebrtc_utility \
    -lwebrtc_video_coding \
    -lwebrtc_vp8 \
    -lyuv \


Thanks!


On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:38 AM, andrea diamantini <adjam7 at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi,
> This is really a great news, IMHO. I would anyway add my +1 to Simon's
> comment recommending to not add (if possible) a new layer of complexity and
> just make libjingle an optional requirement to have WebRTC support in
> qt/qtwebkit.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> 2013/2/18 Hausmann Simon <Simon.Hausmann at digia.com>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Sounds all very good :). I would however recommend that we simply make
>> libjingle a requirement for WebRTC
>> instead of introducing a layer/module in the middle. It seems libjingle
>> works on Unixy platforms as well as Windows.
>>
>>
>>
>> Simon
>>
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> From: webkit-qt-bounces at lists.webkit.org [
>> webkit-qt-bounces at lists.webkit.org] on behalf of Igor Borovkov [
>> igor at borovkov.com]
>> Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2013 19:41
>> To: development at qt-project.org; webkit-qt at lists.webkit.org
>> Subject: [webkit-qt] New module "qtwebrtc": WebRTC support for QtWebkit
>> and     native apps
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'd like to give a quick heads-up about our current work on Qt and
>> QtWebkit.
>>
>> One of our teams are actively working on WebRTC integration into Qt and
>> QtWebkit.
>> We have resources available to finish it as soon as possible,
>> and we'd love to contribute that work back to the community.
>>
>> Right now we already have/use patched QtWebkit which directly uses
>> libjingle library for WebRTC support.
>> It may not work for everybody, thus we're working toward introducing a
>> new Qt module "qtwebrtc",
>> which will abstract particular WebRTC implementations (like libjingle)
>> for QtWebkit.
>>
>> Also qtwebrtc module would be possible to use for creating Qt native RTC
>> applications.
>>
>> Your thoughts and opinions on this would be greatly appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> webkit-qt mailing list
>> webkit-qt at lists.webkit.org
>> https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-qt
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Andrea Diamantini
> WEB: http://www.adjam.org
>
> rekonq project
> WEB: http://rekonq.kde.org
> IRC: rekonq at freenode
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-qt/attachments/20130219/cf869b56/attachment.html>