[webkit-qt] updating qt5?

[Rafael Brandao]

Sure!

On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Simon Hausmann <simon.hausmann at digia.com>wrote:

> On Wednesday, October 03, 2012 01:15:41 PM Osztrogonac Csaba wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Any other pros/cons? Simon? Noam?
> >
> > If there isn't any objection, and there isn't new regressions
> > I'm going to do the update on the bots this friday.
> >
> > br,
> > Ossy
> >
> > Andras Becsi írta:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 2 October 2012 15:36, Balazs Kelemen <kbalazs at webkit.org> wrote:
> > >>   Hi qtwebkittens!
> > >>
> > >> I would like to update our qt5 tree because a patch of mine has been
> > >> landed
> > >> today that is needed to go ahead with pixel tests. Are you ok with
> that?
> > >
> > > If there are no layout test regressions or build errors with current
> > > qt5.git master then nothing is blocking us from rolling to a more
> > > recent Qt5 hash.
> > > I think most of us already use a recent Qt5 anyway.
> > >
> > >> Alternatively we can select a set of pending changes important for us
> -
> > >> if
> > >> there are such changes - and delay the update until all of them lands.
> > >> Opinions?
> > >
> > > I'd rather update than cherry-pick, maybe switch to a more frequent
> > > update process if needed.
>
> Sounds good to me :)
>
> Rafael, can you take care of the Mac build bot?
>
> Simon
> _______________________________________________
> webkit-qt mailing list
> webkit-qt at lists.webkit.org
> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-qt
>



-- 
Rafael Brandao @ INdT
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-qt/attachments/20121003/288dd03f/attachment.html>