Hey,<br><br>On Sex, 9 Mai, 2014 at 1:49 , Martin Robinson <mrobinson@webkit.org> wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite"><div class="plaintext" style="white-space: pre-wrap;">On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 11:42 PM, Carlos Garcia Campos
<cgarcia@igalia.com> wrote:
<blockquote> I don't understand this, if sites are working with the current UA, we
just need to make sure we keep using that UA for those specific sites
that break. It's a matter of filing bugs when we detect something is
broken because of the UA.
</blockquote>
I imagine that for some sites, no matter what UA we send, some aspect
of the site will be broken or missing. Masquerading as a Mac or
Chromium may fix many issues, but the site can use that information to
make an assumption about those platforms that we cannot fulfill.</div></blockquote><br><div>That sounds likely, but we can cross that bridge when we get to it - we may even come up with a solution! =)</div><div><br></div><div>Gustavo</div>