[webkit-efl] Fixing --no-tiled-backing-store build

Gyuyoung Kim gyuyoung.kim at webkit.org
Wed Mar 27 23:36:21 PDT 2013


As I commented on the bug, I think it would be best X server 1.13.0
supports WebKit EFL layout test. However, if it will not support EFL layout
test in the near future, it looks we may need to support
--no-tiled-backing-store option again. Because I also heard that some
WebKit EFL engineers suffered from this issue. But, I still think best is
to support X server 1.13.0 on EFL.

Any other opinions?


On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Ed Bartosh <bartosh at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> I need your suggestions.
> I'm trying to fix EFL build with disabled accelerated composition
> (--no-tiled-backing-store build option).
> I used this option because of X server 1.13.0<http://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-efl/2012-November/000434.html> issue,
> mentioned here:
> http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/WebKitEFLLayoutTest#Knownissues
> I'm trying to build on Ubuntu 12.10, which has X server 1.13.0 with this
> regression.
> It was not that easy to fix this as I suspected as it's required a lot of
> changes, but it was fun and I learned a bit of WebKit code.
> You can see some details in this bug:
> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11315<https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113153>
> 3
> Can you please suggest what should I do next? Should I split this patch to
> several patches or leave it as it is? Whom to ask for review?
> Considering the amount of changes was it at all feasible to fix this build
> or it would be better to simply get rid of --no-tiled-backing-store option?
> Thank you,
> --
> BR,
> Ed
> _______________________________________________
> webkit-efl mailing list
> webkit-efl at lists.webkit.org
> https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-efl
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-efl/attachments/20130328/24fd3415/attachment.html>

More information about the webkit-efl mailing list