<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>On Jan 28, 2014, at 7:49 AM, Martin Robinson <<a href="mailto:mrobinson@webkit.org">mrobinson@webkit.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: medium; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; display: inline !important; float: none; ">Yes, GTK+ on Windows does not use accelerated compositing.</span></blockquote></div><br><div>This begs the question: How widely used is the GTK+ port of WebKit on Windows? Do enough people use it that it's worth the maintenance burden for the other ports that use accelerated compositing?</div><div><br></div><div>- Anders</div><div><br></div></body></html>