<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><div>On Jan 16, 2014, at 2:28 AM, Alexey Proskuryakov <<a href="mailto:ap@webkit.org">ap@webkit.org</a>> wrote:</div><div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=koi8-r"><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><div apple-content-edited="true"><br></div><div><div>15 янв. 2014 г., в 23:02, Ryosuke Niwa <<a href="mailto:rniwa@webkit.org">rniwa@webkit.org</a>> написал(а):</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; margin: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; border-left-width: 1px; border-left-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); border-left-style: solid; padding-left: 1ex; position: static; z-index: auto;"><div style="word-wrap: break-word;"><div>I think that it's good to try not dumping build failures into comments right away, and to see what happens.</div><div class="im"><div><br></div><div>As for not showing style bot failures, it seems almost certain that this will make them substantially more annoying to work with. Can you describe the workflow for patch author and reviewer to deal with style bot warnings when they are not inline? Manually finding relevant lines by number can't work.</div><div><br></div><div>I agree with Tim that dumping all tested paths along with style warnings is silly. How hard would it be it to get rid of that?</div></div></div></blockquote><div style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><br></div><div style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;">The workflow is to click on the bubble to see the style errors. e.g.</div><div style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><a href="https://webkit-queues.appspot.com/results/6544662978363392">https://webkit-queues.appspot.com/results/6544662978363392</a><br></div></blockquote></div><div><br></div>Seems like that would require everyone to manually match errors to code lines indeed, so I object against making this change for style checker warnings.<br><div><br></div><div>- WBR, Alexey Proskuryakov</div></div></blockquote><br></div><div><div>Yeah, seeing the style warnings as a comment (which also causes them to show up in the patch review) is helpful. I was just complaining about the python path spew it also includes.</div><br><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; border-spacing: 0px;">— Timothy Hatcher<br></span></div></div></body></html>