<div dir="ltr">Sounds like a good idea.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div>- R. Niwa</div>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 5:00 AM, Daniel Batyai <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dbatyai.u-szeged@partner.samsung.com" target="_blank">dbatyai.u-szeged@partner.samsung.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
Hello Everyone!<br>
<br>
Is there anyone, who prefers wdiff over prettypatch? If not, then I propose to remove wdiff.<br>
Wdiff and prettypatch do basically the same thing, we don't need both of them. Pretty diff is the same diff that is used in the bugzilla formatted diffs, so it would be the logical one to use in the tests, and since ruby is already a dependency, prettypatch should be available to every platform.<br>
<a href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124766" target="_blank">https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124766</a><br>
<br>
Daniel<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
webkit-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org">webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>