<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>On Aug 1, 2012, at 4:36 PM, Elliott Sprehn <<a href="mailto:esprehn@chromium.org">esprehn@chromium.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Bruno Abinader <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:brunoabinader@gmail.com" target="_blank">brunoabinader@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi all :)<br>
<br>
As suggested by Ojan, I am writing a mail to you about my intention to<br>
implement all updated and missing text-decoration* properties from<br>
CSS3 spec (currently in development), named below:<br>
<br>
-webkit-text-decoration ( <a href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92000" target="_blank">https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92000</a> )<br>
CSS3 dev spec: <a href="http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-text/#text-decoration" target="_blank">http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-text/#text-decoration</a><br>
Mozilla ref: <a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/en/CSS/text-decoration" target="_blank">https://developer.mozilla.org/en/CSS/text-decoration</a><br>
Status: Proposed patch / pending review<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>It seems weird to have a prefixed version of text-decoration instead of just making text-decoration allow the new prefixed keywords.</div><div><br>
</div><div>What's the reason for having a whole new prefixed property?</div></div></blockquote><br></div><div>Making regular text-decoration accept prefixed keywords for the new/unstable tuff sounds like a good approach to me. I too am curious why that is not proposed.</div><div><br></div><div> - Maciej</div><div><br></div><br></body></html>