This does seem like a great idea. The more pixel tests we can run on the bots, the better!<div><br></div><div>J<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Dirk Schulze <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:krit@webkit.org">krit@webkit.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">I strongly support pixel tests for SVG on the bots! Niko and me are hard working to get SVG pxiel perfect at all time. We run pixel tests on every patch we apply to the SVG code. And it would really help us if the bots blame any change that causes a pixel test to fail, or at least give some kind of feedback.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Dirk<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
> Good evening webkit folks,<br>
><br>
> I've finished landing svg/ pixel test baselines, which pass with --tolerance 0 on my 10.5 & 10.6 machines.<br>
> As the pixel testing is very important for the SVG tests, I'd like to run them on the bots, experimentally, so we can catch regressions easily.<br>
><br>
> Maybe someone with direct access to the leopard & snow leopard bots, could just run "run-webkit-tests --tolerance 0 -p svg" and mail me the results?<br>
> If it passes, we could maybe run the pixel tests for the svg/ subdirectory on these bots?<br>
><br>
> Cheers,<br>
> Niko<br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> webkit-dev mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org">webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
webkit-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org">webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>