<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 10:41 PM, Mike Hommey <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mh%2Bwebkit@glandium.org">mh+webkit@glandium.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 04:03:32PM -0700, Mike Belshe wrote:<br>
> Total size Potential savings<br>
</div>> <a href="http://www.cnn.com" target="_blank">www.cnn.com</a>: 43M <a href="http://410Kwww.facebook.com" target="_blank">410Kwww.facebook.com</a>:<br>
<div class="Ih2E3d">> 43M 408K<br>
> <a href="http://www.slashdot.org" target="_blank">www.slashdot.org</a>: 36M 208K<br>
> <a href="http://m.ext.google.com" target="_blank">m.ext.google.com</a>: 45M 475K<br>
> docs (normal doc): 42M 341K<br>
> docs (big spreadsheet): 55M 905K<br>
> maps: 38M 159K<br>
<br>
</div>It would be interesting to have the figures on 64-bit systems.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Why would it be different, since WebKit is (AFAIK) always compiled in 32-bit mode? Or is it 64-bit compat now?</div><div>
<br></div><div>PK </div></div></div>