Hi,<br><br>I read several articles on SquirrelFish performance.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://webkit.org/blog/189/announcing-squirrelfish/">http://webkit.org/blog/189/announcing-squirrelfish/</a><br>
<a href="http://www.satine.org/archives/2008/06/03/squirrelfish-is-faster-than-tamarin/">http://www.satine.org/archives/2008/06/03/squirrelfish-is-faster-than-tamarin/</a><br>
<a href="http://summerofjsc.blogspot.com/2008/06/squirrelfish-has-landed.html">http://summerofjsc.blogspot.com/2008/06/squirrelfish-has-landed.html</a><br>
<br>I was impressed with the performance improvements in the recent work of SquirrelFish. After reading those articles, I have two questions regarding SquirrelFish.<br><br>1) Bytecode size<br><br>Is SquirrelFish bytecode compact? How much size reduction can I expect from normal JS source code?<br>
<br><br>2) Compile speed<br><br>I see the overall performance of SuqirrelFIsh is quite impressive. However, I want to know how long it takes to compile JavaScript source code to bytecode vs. how long it takes to execute the bytecode. I guess it is much faster than JIT compiler, but I could not find the exact number.<br>
<br><br>Regards,<br>Kwang Yul Seo<br><br>