[webkit-dev] NEON_INTRINSICS
Maciej Stachowiak
mjs at apple.com
Mon Mar 9 11:34:57 PDT 2015
Requiring a perf bot to be set up before removing unmaintained code seems like a really high bar. What would it take to do a one-shot test of whether NEON_INTRINSICS is a perf benefit? Would it show up on PLT or on JS perf benchmarks if you compiled with it? If it’s not a speedup in its existing form, then it’s probably not worth keeping around. If it is, then that might be incentive for someone to get it production-ready and on by default for relevant platforms.
Regards,
Maciej
> On Mar 8, 2015, at 6:56 PM, Benjamin Poulain <benjamin at webkit.org> wrote:
>
> That code looks straightforward, the maintenance cost is likely low. We
> just really need a test bot to run that code.
>
> I suggest we wait until we have a ARMv7 perf bot and re-evaluate
> NEON_INTRINSICS.
>
> On 05/03/2015 22:27, Carlos Garcia Campos wrote:
>> Yesterday a patch was submitted to fix the build with NEON_INTRINSICS,
>> and Ossy pointed out that the build has been broken since r170433, and
>> nobody has noticed it until now. So that makes me wonder if anybody is
>> actually using that and if it even works, because otherwise we should
>> probably remove the NEON_INTRINSICS code.
>>
>> So, is there anybody actually using that (I guess patched downstream)?
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> webkit-dev mailing list
>> webkit-dev at lists.webkit.org
>> https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> webkit-dev mailing list
> webkit-dev at lists.webkit.org
> https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
More information about the webkit-dev
mailing list