[webkit-dev] Windows Build Now on VS2015

[zan at falconsigh.net]

On Tue, Aug 25, 2015, at 12:55 PM, Carlos Garcia Campos wrote:
> El mar, 25-08-2015 a las 12:47 +0200, zan at falconsigh.net escribió:
> > On Fri, Aug 14, 2015, at 07:19 PM, Alex Christensen wrote:
> > > The days of supporting VS2013 are behind us, so if it works with 
> > > VS2015, go for it.  Not all c++14 features are supported, though. 
> > >  See 
> > > https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh567368.aspx#cpp14table
> > >  
> > > I’m not sure what the oldest gcc we support is.
> >  
> > The oldest GCC we support is 4.7.0.
> 
> Nope, we bumped it to 4.9.0 because of the bug in 4.8 that caused
> failures in the database process implementation (see bug #98932).
>  

The EFL port didn't, to the best of my knowledge.

> > GCC 5.0 supports all but one C++14 proposal (which covers allocation 
> > optimizations and shouldn't be a blocker):
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx1y.html
> 
> My main concern is how stable those features are in GCC, though.
>  
> > Clang has full C++14 coverage since version 3.4, but I'm not aware of 
> > any incorporated check for a minimal Clang version.
> >  
> > > > On Aug 14, 2015, at 5:49 AM, Antti Koivisto <koivisto at iki.fi> 
> > > > wrote:
> > > >  
> > > > Does this mean we can start using (most) C++14 features?
> > > >  
> > > >  
> > > >   antti
> > > >  
> > > >  
> > > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 6:13 AM, Brent Fulgham <
> > > > bfulgham at apple.com> wrote:
> > > > Hi Floks,
> > > >  
> > > > We’ve finished updating the various Windows builds to VS2015. 
> > > > Full regression tests are now completing on these new builds, and 
> > > > seem to be comparable in terms of stability and correctness.
> > > >  
> > > > Please let me know if you encounter any new issues on Windows. I 
> > > > know that EA encountered some JavaScript issues in a prior 
> > > > revision, but I haven’t been able to replicate this problem (at 
> > > > least yet).
> > > >  
> > > > VS2015 is churning out a number of new build warnings, which I 
> > > > hope to address over the coming weeks. It will also likely have 
> > > > some useful static analysis results in the Windows-specific 
> > > > portions of the code that we should evaluate.
> > > >  
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >  
> > > > -Brent
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > webkit-dev mailing list
> > > > webkit-dev at lists.webkit.org
> > > > https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
> > > >  
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > webkit-dev mailing list
> > > > webkit-dev at lists.webkit.org
> > > > https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > webkit-dev mailing list
> > > webkit-dev at lists.webkit.org
> > > https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
> >  
> > _______________________________________________
> > webkit-dev mailing list
> > webkit-dev at lists.webkit.org
> > https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
> _______________________________________________
> webkit-dev mailing list
> webkit-dev at lists.webkit.org
> https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev