[webkit-dev] Downtime for Bugzilla upgrade on Thursday, October 16 from 8-10 AM PDT

[David Kilzer]

On Oct 16, 2014, at 4:04 PM, David Kilzer <ddkilzer at webkit.org> wrote:

> On Oct 16, 2014, at 2:38 PM, David Kilzer <ddkilzer at webkit.org> wrote:
> 
>> Two commit queue issues:
>> 
>> 1. Patches are landing, but bugs aren't being closed.  Looks like webkit-patch is failing because a textarea is disabled by default.
> 
> Bug 137794: commit-queue: fails to close bugs after successfully landing patches
> <https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137794>
> <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/174797>
> 
> Tentatively fixed.  Still waiting for a cq+ patch to land with this fix applied.  (There are some in flight that will not have this fix yet.)
> 
>> 2. Some commit queue patches fail to apply because 'OOPS!' is not being removed from ChangeLog entries.
> 
> Bug 137795: commit-queue: fails to replace OO-PS! with reviewer name
> <https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137795>
> 
> Investigating this now.

Tentative fix (for the first issue found) checked in:  <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/174800>

If neither of these work, please let me know.  I'll check in later tonight to see how things are going.

Dave


> Dave
> 
> 
>> Investigating.
>> 
>> Dave
>> --
>> Sent from my iPhone 6
>> 
>> On Oct 16, 2014, at 10:58 AM, David Kilzer <ddkilzer at webkit.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> Update complete.
>>> 
>>> Please file bugs on bugs.webkit.org and reply to this thread with the bug.
>>> 
>>> Thanks!
>>> 
>>> Dave
>>> --
>>> Sent from my iPhone 6
>>> 
>>> On Oct 16, 2014, at 10:56 AM, David Kilzer <ddkilzer at webkit.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Sorry, sent this from the wrong address before the update.
>>>> 
>>>>> On Oct 16, 2014, at 3:33 AM, Osztrogonác Csaba <oszi at inf.u-szeged.hu> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> have you tried if the webkit-patch bugzilla tool (upload,
>>>>> apply-attachment, apply-from-bug, ... ), the review tool,
>>>>> the commit queue and EWS will work properly with the new
>>>>> bugzilla version?
>>>> 
>>>> I did verify webkit-patch upload works.  We don't have an easy way to test commit queue and EWS outside of the production environment.  (That is something we want to improve going forward.)
>>>> 
>>>> If those are too broken to fix quickly, the plan is to roll back.
>>>> 
>>>>> I think they are very fragile and highly rely on the generated
>>>>> HTML forms. I prefer fixing these tools before updating to
>>>>> breaking them and then trying to fix.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I wanted to upgrade as soon as possible to patch security issues that were not back-ported to the version we were running.
>>>> 
>>>>> Just out of curiosity, if we do an upgrade, why do we upgrade
>>>>> to the old stable release (4.2.11), why not the latest stable
>>>>> relase (4.4.6)? Is there a fundamental reason for it?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> It was the quickest path to upgrade to a version where security patches were available.
>>>> 
>>>> I had upgraded to 4.2.5 about a year ago, and had qualified over 90% of the website, so it was quickest to upgrade to 4.2.11 rather than 4.4.6 (which could have introduced more compat issues with tools).
>>>> 
>>>>> There are many good fixes in 4.4 release. If we can't upgrade
>>>>> to 4.4 for some reason, it would be great to cherry-pick at
>>>>> least the following changes:
>>>>> 
>>>>> "It is now possible to add yourself to the CC list when uploading an attachment and when editing an existing one." (note)
>>>>> --> auto cc reviewer - https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124047 )
>>>>> 
>>>>> "Changes to the CC list no longer causes midair collisions." (note)
>>>>> --> It is very annoying if you are commenting a bug, and you
>>>>> have to start it again if somebody else cc-ed him/herself.
>>>>> Or if you clicked force, it would remove these new cc-s.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> After we upgrade to 4.2.11, I will start work on 4.4.6 (plus a way to test the EWS and commit queue with our test environment).
>>>> 
>>>>> And one more question: Are you planning to check-in
>>>>> the new bugzilla to Websites/bugs.webkit.org ?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Yes.  That will be part of the upgrade.  It's split into many individual patches (and 3 merge patches); I didn't want to squash-merge it in case it was easier to fix a future bug based on these changes.
>>>> 
>>>> Dave
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> (note): http://www.bugzilla.org/releases/4.4/release-notes.html#v44_feat
>>>>> 
>>>>> br,
>>>>> Ossy
>>>>> 
>>>>> David Kilzer írta:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> We’re planning on upgrading Bugzilla (bugs.webkit.org <http://bugs.webkit.org/>) from 3.2.3 to 4.2.11 on Thursday, October 16 from 8-10 AM PDT <x-apple-data-detectors://1>.
>>>>>> Sorry for the short notice.  I sent this message from the wrong address, and didn't see he bounce message until now.
>>>>>> Please let me know if you have questions or concerns.  Thanks!
>>>>>> Dave
>>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> webkit-dev mailing list
>>>> webkit-dev at lists.webkit.org
>>>> https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> webkit-dev mailing list
>>> webkit-dev at lists.webkit.org
>>> https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> webkit-dev mailing list
>> webkit-dev at lists.webkit.org
>> https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> webkit-dev mailing list
> webkit-dev at lists.webkit.org
> https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/attachments/20141016/3e9a39c8/attachment.html>