[webkit-dev] Guideline for nullptr

Anders Carlsson andersca at apple.com
Mon Jan 6 12:04:24 PST 2014


On Jan 6, 2014, at 12:01 PM, Dan Bernstein <mitz at apple.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
>> On Jan 6, 2014, at 11:55 AM, Darin Adler <darin at apple.com> wrote:
>> 
>> I suggest we use nullptr, rather than of 0 or NULL, for all pointer nulls in WebKit C++ sources. I don’t see any advantage to using 0 or NULL over nullptr, and nullptr has multiple advantages. Three obvious ones: Compile time error if accidentally passed to something expecting an integer, can be distinguished from an integer in function overloading, can tell it’s a pointer.
>> 
>> Any objections?

I think this is a great idea and something I’ve been doing ever since nullptr became available to us.

>> 
>> — Darin
>> 
>> PS: Maybe even instead of nil in WebKit Objective-C++ code?
> 
> In Objective-C++, nil is nullptr, so I suggest that we stick with the language convention of writing it as nil.

I agree. (Also, using Nil for null classes).

- Anders



More information about the webkit-dev mailing list