No subject

"mobile" ports of past were way-buggy and probably only ever tested with
ASCII. I'd say use ICU and don't look back :-)

Alp.


On 06/10/2013 20:08, Geoffrey Garen wrote:
>> There is an issue with ICU: it uses UTF16 as its internal representation, while most of the Web nowadays is UTF8. Therefore, page text goes through unnecessary encoding conversion, and takes more memory than in UTF8 (for most of languages). So it might be not a good development direction to tie up WebKit to ICU.
> Is there a benchmark or website that can verify these claims?
>
> Thanks,
> Geoff
> _______________________________________________
> webkit-dev mailing list
> webkit-dev at lists.webkit.org
> https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev

-- 
http://www.nuanti.com
the browser experts