[webkit-dev] generic test expectations?

[Tony Chang]

On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Darin Adler <darin at apple.com> wrote:

> On Nov 13, 2012, at 12:02 PM, Tony Chang <tony at chromium.org> wrote:
>
> > I don't think we should support port specific ref test results. That
> kind of misses the point of using a ref test in the first place. I mean,
> you may as well check in port specific pixel results which are easier to
> review for correctness.
>
> I don’t agree that pixel results are easier to review for correctness.
>

Here is a ref test result from ietestcenter:
http://trac.webkit.org/browser/trunk/LayoutTests/ietestcenter/css3/flexbox/flexbox-flex-002-expected.htm

Looking at that HTML file, it's not immediately obvious that the result is
correct.  If I had a png file, it would easy to see if there's red showing
or not.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/attachments/20121113/de1a8639/attachment.html>