[webkit-dev] Making more use of ScriptWrappable
mjs at apple.com
Fri Nov 2 01:09:41 PDT 2012
On Nov 2, 2012, at 12:45 AM, Adam Barth <abarth at webkit.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs at apple.com> wrote:
>> (3) I suspect that we can handle this without adding an IDL attribute at all. C++ overloaded functions could let the bindings do something different for objects that inherit ScriptWrappable from ones that do not in a generic way, without having to explicitly tell the bindings layer about the ways to do it. Consider the ways unwrap() and toJS() are done. We don't have to say anything special in the IDL or have any interface-specific knowledge in the bindings, C++ overloading takes care of it.
> That's a good idea. I'll see if we can avoid the IDL attribute.
> I wonder if we can do the same for the ActiveDOMObject IDL attribute,
> which similarly announces the presence of a base class.
Good thought. ActiveDOMObject is a little different, because it implies some Web-observable behavior rather than just something about the mechanics of binding. But despite that, it's probably still better not to mention it in IDL if there is no technical need to do so.
More information about the webkit-dev