[webkit-dev] Can we remove webkit prefix from Battery Status API and from Vibration API?

[Ojan Vafai]

On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Kihong Kwon <vimff0 at gmail.com> wrote:

> > Has a test suite been published we can test against?
>
> I didn't see a test suite which is opened to everyone yet.
> Is this a problem for dropping prefix?
>

It's not strictly required for dropping the prefix. But it would be good to
have some confidence that our implementation is interoperable with other
implementations. Can you run our tests against Firefox and see that we get
the same results? Also, could you see if Firefox has any tests that we
fail? You can report the results on the bugs directly so reviewers have
that information.


>
> > Are there any other implementations of the APIs? Besides the time-based
> > requirement of dropping vendor prefixes when a specification goes to
> > Candidate Recommendation status, unprefixing also implies operability
> with
> > both the specification and other implementations. It'll be good to
> confirm
> > that.
>
> Firefox already implements these APIs.
> https://wiki.mozilla.org/WebAPI
> https://developer.mozilla.org/en/DOM/window.navigator.battery
> https://developer.mozilla.org/en/DOM/window.navigator.battery
>
> And these APIs have been entered CR as you know.
>
> BR,
> Kihong.
> _______________________________________________
> webkit-dev mailing list
> webkit-dev at lists.webkit.org
> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/attachments/20120801/2a186839/attachment.html>