[webkit-dev] Reg. New File Inclusion Style for Webkit

Peter Kasting pkasting at google.com
Sun Nov 20 16:54:12 PST 2011


On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 1:57 AM, Arunprasad Rajkumar <ararunprasad at gmail.com
> wrote:

> Why don't we follow chrome style of file inclusions rather than the usual.
>
> For example,
> *#include "WebCore/Page/Chrome.h"*
>
> This will be more convient way of representing the inclusion. Hope it will
> avoid long compiler inclusion paths and file namespace issues.


Here are some pros and cons I can think of:

Pros:
* If used pervasively, would allow us to greatly trim the compiler include
search paths, possibly providing a noticeable build speedup (I have no
estimated numbers).
* Makes it slightly more obvious to a reader what, precisely, is being
depended upon; might make it easier to notice layering violations.

Cons:
* Would require us to convert the existing codebase (possibly easy with the
help of a script, but would at least result in touching all the files)
* Generates more "change noise" when a header is moved around
* Could pose problems for ports that need to supply particular headers from
some override directory instead of the "typical" spot.  (I'm being vague
here because I think this is probably a real issue but I don't actually
know the details of enough ports' build setups to be clear.)

I would prefer the full-path style myself, especially if there is really a
build-time win, but I strongly suspect that a lot of folks would see the
benefit here as not worth the cost.

PK
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/attachments/20111120/3a53d094/attachment.html>


More information about the webkit-dev mailing list