[webkit-dev] new-run-webkit-tests new results.html format

Eric Seidel eric at webkit.org
Tue May 3 14:24:03 PDT 2011


If we have + buttons for all the failures, might as well have them for
the http logs too. :p

On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Eric Seidel <eric at webkit.org> wrote:
> IIRC the "showing wdiff when there is no wdiff" bug has since been
> fixed? (but that bot just hasn't updated?)
>
> what's the "failure type" column? (and why can't I select its text?)
>
> Why do expected flaky tests show up in the "Expected to fail but passed" list?
>
> Seems expected flaky tests should be in some sort of separate
> (less-obvious, possibly hidden-by-default) table.  It looks like
> they're currently split between the failure and the pass tables when
> wether they passed or failed doesn't seem relevant to this run.
>
> -eric
>
> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Dirk Pranke <dpranke at chromium.org> wrote:
>> Here is a link to the NRWT bot running the Mac Leopard Release build:
>>
>> http://build.webkit.org/results/Leopard%20Intel%20Release%20(NRWT)/r85644%20(142)/results.html
>>
>> -- Dirk
>>
>> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Eric Seidel <eric at webkit.org> wrote:
>>> Is that a good example?  It doesn't remind me much of the ORWT output.
>>>
>>> The disclosure triangles don't seem to do anything for hte failures on
>>> that page.
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Ojan Vafai <ojan at chromium.org> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Adam Roben <aroben at apple.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On May 3, 2011, at 4:01 PM, Ojan Vafai wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The results load considerably faster now. For runs where many tests fail,
>>>>> the filesize is considerably smaller than the
>>>>> old-run-webkit-tests filesize. Also, I've added in the image toggling
>>>>> behavior of old-run-webkit-tests and made the aesthetics a bit closer to the
>>>>> old-run-webkit-test format.
>>>>> Some rough file sizes if you care about the details.
>>>>> old-run-webkit-tests 5 failures: 5k
>>>>> old-run-webkit-tests 500 failures: 250k
>>>>> new-run-webkit-tests 5 failures: 1k json + 25k htmljs
>>>>> new-run-webkit-tests 500 failures: 60k json + 25k html/js
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for all the work you've put into this, Ojan! Is there a link we can
>>>>> use to look at the latest and greatest?
>>>>
>>>> http://build.chromium.org/f/chromium/layout_test_results/Webkit_Linux/results/layout-test-results/results.html
>>>> Disclaimer: The json file loaded on that page is much larger (~90x) than the
>>>> non-Chromium equivalent would be because Chromium runs tests expected to
>>>> fail.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> webkit-dev mailing list
>>>> webkit-dev at lists.webkit.org
>>>> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>


More information about the webkit-dev mailing list