[webkit-dev] new-run-webkit-tests new results.html format

[Dirk Pranke]

Here is a link to the NRWT bot running the Mac Leopard Release build:

http://build.webkit.org/results/Leopard%20Intel%20Release%20(NRWT)/r85644%20(142)/results.html

-- Dirk

On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Eric Seidel <eric at webkit.org> wrote:
> Is that a good example?  It doesn't remind me much of the ORWT output.
>
> The disclosure triangles don't seem to do anything for hte failures on
> that page.
>
> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Ojan Vafai <ojan at chromium.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Adam Roben <aroben at apple.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On May 3, 2011, at 4:01 PM, Ojan Vafai wrote:
>>>
>>> The results load considerably faster now. For runs where many tests fail,
>>> the filesize is considerably smaller than the
>>> old-run-webkit-tests filesize. Also, I've added in the image toggling
>>> behavior of old-run-webkit-tests and made the aesthetics a bit closer to the
>>> old-run-webkit-test format.
>>> Some rough file sizes if you care about the details.
>>> old-run-webkit-tests 5 failures: 5k
>>> old-run-webkit-tests 500 failures: 250k
>>> new-run-webkit-tests 5 failures: 1k json + 25k htmljs
>>> new-run-webkit-tests 500 failures: 60k json + 25k html/js
>>>
>>> Thanks for all the work you've put into this, Ojan! Is there a link we can
>>> use to look at the latest and greatest?
>>
>> http://build.chromium.org/f/chromium/layout_test_results/Webkit_Linux/results/layout-test-results/results.html
>> Disclaimer: The json file loaded on that page is much larger (~90x) than the
>> non-Chromium equivalent would be because Chromium runs tests expected to
>> fail.
>> _______________________________________________
>> webkit-dev mailing list
>> webkit-dev at lists.webkit.org
>> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
>>
>>
>