[webkit-dev] Use of -webkit- prefix on CSS Values and Properties
Ojan Vafai
ojan at chromium.org
Wed Mar 30 15:15:38 PDT 2011
I've emailed John Resig and a contact at MSDN for their respective test
suites. I haven't heard back from them. I'll ping.
The change is backwards compatible. As far as I know, no other vendors have
modified :not, but I haven't checked. The spec just got this wording last
week.
Ojan
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 4:25 AM, David Hyatt <hyatt at apple.com> wrote:
> Yeah, I'd prefer not to prefix :not. (Haha.)
>
> In fact :not used to actually support more complex selectors, and I had to
> dumb it down to pass stupid CSS 2.1 tests that deliberately checked for the
> lack of complexity... so all we'd be doing is going back to our old
> behavior. We should probably make sure those tests are not in the current
> version of the suite though.
>
> dave
> (hyatt at apple.com)
>
> On Mar 30, 2011, at 10:50 AM, Simon Fraser wrote:
>
> If the change is backwards compatible (i.e. if you don't break the behavior
> described in Selectors 3), then I don't think it needs to be prefixed.
>
> What have other vendors done?
>
> Simon
>
> On Mar 30, 2011, at 12:05 AM, Ojan Vafai wrote:
>
> What's the right thing to do for something that is in a CR spec, but the
> draft spec for the next version has it behave differently? Specifically, in
> Selectors 3, :not only accepts a single simple selector. In Selectors 4, it
> accepts a comma separated list of compound selectors (a superset of the
> Selectors 3 behavior). See https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56994.
>
> I see three options:
> 1. Wait until Selectors 4 hits CR before changing :not.
> 2. Implement :-webkit-not to match Selectors 4 and leave :not matching
> Selectors 3.
> 3. Make :not match Selectors 4.
>
> My preference in this instance is option 3.
>
> Ojan
>
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 7:17 AM, David Hyatt <hyatt at apple.com> wrote:
>
>> As was mentioned already, we've been trying to follow the general
>> guideline of dropping the prefix when a draft hits CR and keeping it
>> otherwise. An exception to this rule is if our syntax has not yet been
>> updated to match the CR syntax, in which case we keep the prefix.
>>
>> dave
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> webkit-dev mailing list
>> webkit-dev at lists.webkit.org
>> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> webkit-dev mailing list
> webkit-dev at lists.webkit.org
> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/attachments/20110331/edc99c14/attachment.html>
More information about the webkit-dev
mailing list