[webkit-dev] Use of -webkit- prefix on CSS Values and Properties
Simon Fraser
simon.fraser at apple.com
Wed Mar 30 08:50:53 PDT 2011
If the change is backwards compatible (i.e. if you don't break the behavior described in Selectors 3), then I don't think it needs to be prefixed.
What have other vendors done?
Simon
On Mar 30, 2011, at 12:05 AM, Ojan Vafai wrote:
> What's the right thing to do for something that is in a CR spec, but the draft spec for the next version has it behave differently? Specifically, in Selectors 3, :not only accepts a single simple selector. In Selectors 4, it accepts a comma separated list of compound selectors (a superset of the Selectors 3 behavior). See https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56994.
>
> I see three options:
> 1. Wait until Selectors 4 hits CR before changing :not.
> 2. Implement :-webkit-not to match Selectors 4 and leave :not matching Selectors 3.
> 3. Make :not match Selectors 4.
>
> My preference in this instance is option 3.
>
> Ojan
>
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 7:17 AM, David Hyatt <hyatt at apple.com> wrote:
> As was mentioned already, we've been trying to follow the general guideline of dropping the prefix when a draft hits CR and keeping it otherwise. An exception to this rule is if our syntax has not yet been updated to match the CR syntax, in which case we keep the prefix.
>
> dave
>
> _______________________________________________
> webkit-dev mailing list
> webkit-dev at lists.webkit.org
> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> webkit-dev mailing list
> webkit-dev at lists.webkit.org
> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/attachments/20110330/99e23ea1/attachment.html>
More information about the webkit-dev
mailing list