[webkit-dev] Extra review requirement for web-facing API? (Was: Re: Spellcheck API for WebKit)
Eric Seidel
eric at webkit.org
Wed Jun 22 11:38:56 PDT 2011
I think it's better for our reviewers to review only things they're
comfortable with.
We could also teach bots (like the style-bot) to complain when seeing new API.
I'd rather not add another layer of process.
-eric
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa at webkit.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Simon Fraser <simon.fraser at apple.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Thank you, Adam.
>>
>> Given this fiasco, I'm temped to propose that we require two levels of
>> review for new web-facing API.
>
> That sounds reasonable. But adding, say, new CSS property or supporting new
> event that has been implemented by other browsers do not seem that risky.
> So maybe only "new" in the sense of it hasn't been implemented by other
> major browsers?
> - Ryosuke
>
> _______________________________________________
> webkit-dev mailing list
> webkit-dev at lists.webkit.org
> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
>
>
More information about the webkit-dev
mailing list