[webkit-dev] Do we have a style preference about const member functions?
darin at apple.com
Wed Jun 8 11:51:37 PDT 2011
On Jun 8, 2011, at 11:48 AM, Peter Kasting wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs at apple.com> wrote:
>> 1) We definitely have consensus to fix the broken non-logically-const accessors by making them non-const; consensus on also adding const accessors is less clear.
> There are a surprising number of places that actually do const traversals. Simply making all these accessors non-const will require removing a lot of valid const usage from the existing code. I'm really uncomfortable with that.
I thought you did it already locally. You mentioned that you decided for many member functions that the right thing was to remove const. I suggested you land those changes first, before making the other changes.
Are we talking about the same thing? Maybe you think Maciej is asking for something he’s not.
More information about the webkit-dev