[webkit-dev] [chromium] using WEBKIT_API properly
Darin Fisher
darin at chromium.org
Tue Jan 4 10:24:06 PST 2011
Correction: you meant "pure virtual" functions.
(I'm adding a note to the README file about these rules by the way.)
-Darin
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 8:55 AM, Darin Fisher <darin at chromium.org> wrote:
> Yes, indeed. Thanks Jeremy!
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 3:13 AM, Jeremy Orlow <jorlow at chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> You forgot to mention virtual functions, which is another case where you
>> do _not_ use WEBKIT_API.
>>
>> J
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Darin Fisher <darin at chromium.org> wrote:
>>
>>> If you do not work on the Chromium port of WebKit, you can stop reading
>>> now.
>>>
>>> I've noticed that there is some confusion about how to use WEBKIT_API
>>> properly.
>>> WEBKIT_API causes a function to be exported from WebKit when it is built
>>> as a DLL,
>>> allowing Chromium to call the function.
>>>
>>> The rule is actually quite simple:
>>>
>>> WEBKIT_API should be affixed to any public, non-inline function that
>>> is intended
>>> for the embedder (Chromium) to call.
>>>
>>> Put another way:
>>> -- Do not apply WEBKIT_API to inline functions.
>>> -- Do not apply WEBKIT_API to private functions.
>>> -- Do not apply WEBKIT_API to public functions within a #if
>>> WEBKIT_IMPLEMENTATION block.
>>>
>>> (Of related note, we never put WEBKIT_API on public constructors and
>>> destructors.
>>> Instead, we have constructors call an initialize method and destructors
>>> call a reset
>>> method. Those then end up having the WEBKIT_API prefix applied.)
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> -Darin
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> webkit-dev mailing list
>>> webkit-dev at lists.webkit.org
>>> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/attachments/20110104/272a342c/attachment.html>
More information about the webkit-dev
mailing list