[webkit-dev] Chromium layout test expectations coming today

[David Levin]

Checking it into the main WebKit checkout seems very much in keeping with
the standard WebKit practice. Several times folks have noted that they like
only having one respository to deal with (just sync webkit and you're set).

On a personal note, I appreciate the simplicity of the WebKit approach --
only having to use git (or svn) vs "git & another script
(sync-webkit-git.py) & gclient" and the associated complexity and multiple
possible points of failure due to the different repositories and multiple
scripts.

dave

On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov at chromium.org>wrote:

> I agree that the idea of only pulling down expectations that you would
> actually need sounds great -- in fact we did try to think of ways of
> how this could be accomplished. So far, no great proposal
> materialized, but it doesn't mean the door of opportunity closes at
> this commit. I would think of this as more of a two-step solution:
>
> Step 1: Align Chromium port with the rest of the WebKit world and
> diminish the cost/pain of WebKit gardening.
> Step 2: Come up with a better way to track dependencies and optional
> components in WebKit.
> Step 3: Profit.
>
> :DG<
>
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Evan Martin <evan at chromium.org> wrote:
> > Before you commit it:
> >
> > Would it make sense to stuff this data somewhere outside of the main
> > checkout, like we do in Chrome with the deps/ dir?
> > I know that's a departure from how the WebKit test results currently
> > work, but I also expect people are not going to be too happy about
> > XXXmb of not-useful-to-them data showing up in their checkouts.  (I
> > guess a step two of this proposal would be to move the other test
> > results alongside this new location.)
> >
> > Technical details of this proposal are vague, but I wanted to get it
> > out there before you hit the commit button.  :)
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov at chromium.org>
> wrote:
> >> WebKit folks,
> >>
> >> We're finally ready to land our port's expected results in the WebKit
> >> tree. It's been a long journey, but we are now to the point where it
> >> no longer makes sense to keep Chromium expectations separate from the
> >> rest of the WebKit.
> >>
> >> It's a pretty large chunk of files, so please bear with us -- you may
> >> experience longer-than-expected checkout time for this commit.
> >>
> >> We are also actively working on porting test_shell (Chromium's test
> >> harness) to DumpRenderTree, to enable running the tests on WebKit
> >> waterfall.
> >>
> >> Until then, you can see test run results on WebKit canaries:
> >>
> http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/waterfall.fyi/waterfall?branch=&builder=Webkit+(webkit.org)&builder=Webkit+Linux+(webkit.org)&builder=Webkit+Mac+(webkit.org)
> .
> >>
> >> :DG<
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> webkit-dev mailing list
> >> webkit-dev at lists.webkit.org
> >> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
> >>
> >
> _______________________________________________
> webkit-dev mailing list
> webkit-dev at lists.webkit.org
> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/attachments/20100319/86e04520/attachment.html>