[webkit-dev] Experimental new code reviews
Andrew Scherkus
scherkus at chromium.org
Tue Apr 20 12:24:09 PDT 2010
Here's the prototype I made during the hackathon that simply uses a bunch of
Javascript to make it easier to type up comments:
http://ascherkus.appspot.com/bugzilla/index.html
I'm not a WebKit reviewer, but from what I gathered during the session
there's a lot of copying and pasting involved. I focused on trying to fix
that particular issue.
Double click a line to add a comment. Code context + comment gets appended
into the patch comment box. It's purely visual -- nothing gets persisted.
Andrew
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Ojan Vafai <ojan at chromium.org> wrote:
> I don't know if it's up anywhere. The other group's approach adds more
> directly upon the current review system. I don't think we need to choose one
> vs. another (at least not in the short term). Not that you were suggesting
> that.
>
> Ojan
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Adam Barth <abarth at webkit.org> wrote:
>
>> +scherkus
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs at apple.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > I heard another group coded up a different approach to improving reviews
>> -
>> > does anyone have a URL for that, so we can compare?
>> > Cheers,
>> > Maciej
>> >
>> > On Apr 19, 2010, at 3:35 PM, Ojan Vafai wrote:
>> >
>> > At the hackathon last Tuesday, a few of us put together mashup style
>> > rietveld integration with bugs.webkit.org. It currently requires a
>> chrome
>> > extension. We'll integrate properly with bugzilla based on feedback if
>> this
>> > seems to be a value add for the project.
>> >
>> http://webkit-rietveld.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/chrome-extension/webkit-cr.crx
>> > You can try it out on the *last* attachment
>> > on https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37531.
>> > You'll see another link next to each attachment labelled "Fancy Review".
>> > This loads a page much like the current review page, but
>> > with wkrietveld.appspot.com in the top frame (wkrietveld is our fork of
>> > rietveld). You can then make comments in rietveld. When you click the
>> submit
>> > button, the comments are published *both* in Reitveld and
>> > to bugs.webkit.org.
>> > We do not intend to remove the old code review system for people who
>> prefer
>> > to stick to that.
>> >
>> > Known issues:
>> > -Currently, only works with patches that are uploaded using
>> "webkit-patch
>> > upload --fancy-review".
>> > -Due to using a chrome extension rather than a tighter integration, some
>> > things are a bit janky (e.g. the initial load).
>> > -Each time a patch is uploaded, it currently creates a new rietveld
>> issue.
>> > Ojan _______________________________________________
>> > webkit-dev mailing list
>> > webkit-dev at lists.webkit.org
>> > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > webkit-dev mailing list
>> > webkit-dev at lists.webkit.org
>> > http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/attachments/20100420/3b374198/attachment.html>
More information about the webkit-dev
mailing list