[webkit-dev] Staging WebSocket protocol deployment
levin at google.com
Fri Nov 13 16:01:25 PST 2009
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Jeremy Orlow <jorlow at chromium.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote:
>> On Fri, 13 Nov 2009, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
>> > I'm not very familiar with the IETF's efforts, but my understanding is
>> > that they were creating a competing protocol. Are they in fact creating
>> > something that they want to submit as a replacement to WebSockets? If
>> > so, why is WebSockets moving to last call?
>> The IETF is just a bunch of open mailing lists, there's no "they" that
>> doesn't include us.
> Sorry I wasn't clear in my word choice. I'm actually on one of the lists,
> though I obviously don't follow it too closely. :-)
> The WebSocket protocol is pretty stable at this point. I doubt it will
>> change much. The recent IETF meeting indicated that most people agree that
>> we want something like WebSockets, and it has already received several
>> years of public review.
>> I wouldn't worry about changing the schemes or anything like that; if the
>> protocol _does_ change in non-backwards-compatible ways, then we'll just
>> change the protocol to not step on this code.
> Just to be clear, you're saying that it's fairly unlikely that it's going
> to change in a backwards compatible way?
He's saying if the protocol changes to be incompatible, then it will no
longer be ws:, wss:
> I ask because there's not much time left to make such decisions before it
> goes into Chrome 4 without the "webkit-" prefix. And once that ship sails,
> there's not much of a point to adding it.
> webkit-dev mailing list
> webkit-dev at lists.webkit.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the webkit-dev