[webkit-dev] Isolated world tests

Oliver Hunt oliver at apple.com
Wed Jul 1 23:07:20 PDT 2009


On Jul 1, 2009, at 10:59 PM, Adam Barth wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Maciej Stachowiak<mjs at apple.com>  
> wrote:
>> We generally wouldn't accept WebKit features that only work with  
>> V8, even if
>> other ports may not immediately plan to use them.
>
> I support this principle.
>
>> I haven't thought through whether this particular feature
>> should be an exception.
>
> The main arguments are as follows:
>
> 1) Isolated worlds is not a web platform feature.  Adding the feature
> to V8 and not to JSC does not create an incompatibility between the
> two engines.  The observable behavior from web content is the same.

WebKit is not just a web platform API -- it is used in a wide variety  
different applications -- that said, if this feature wasn't relevant  
to WebKit it wouldn't need to be in WebKit

>
> 2) The purpose of implementing isolated worlds is so the app can
> implement an app-specific feature (extensions).  Implementing
> extensions in another app requires a lot more than just isolated
> worlds.

However if isolated worlds is necessary to provide effective security  
controls in any application that wished to be extensible in the face  
of arbitrary untrusted content, and it needs to be in webcore (if it  
doesn't my prior comment applies, this doesn't need to be in the  
webkit tree) then any application that wishes to use webkit will need  
webkit to provide this unless every application shipped its own copy  
of webkit with its own implementation of isolated worlds.

>
> 3) I don't foresee the implementation touching any source files
> outside of WebCore/bindings/v8.  Other ports do not need to bear any
> costs because of isolated worlds.

As i've said if isolated worlds has a real usecase then there is no  
reason to not actually provide it

>
>> In general, I think using regression tests for features that are not
>> directly exposed to Web content, but implemented in WebCore/WebKit,  
>> is
>> reasonable. For example we have tests that check that WebKit's  
>> delegate
>> methods relating to load progress are dispatched in the correct  
>> order.
>
> Perhaps I've been indoctrinated into the cult, but I wouldn't want to
> work on something without writing tests.

Agreed, and what JS engine is being used should not effect the results  
of those tests.



More information about the webkit-dev mailing list