[webkit-dev] want to port JIT to MIPS
barraclough at apple.com
Thu Feb 19 22:01:10 PST 2009
On Feb 19, 2009, at 8:27 PM, x yz wrote:
> I'd appreaciate your help to clarify the problem I faced:
> 1.In JIT.cpp I roughly understand ctiTrampoline() except for
> sp-0x1C, I guess the 1C includes 6 argument yet the 7th or 1st may
> be the hidden C++ pointer? And the reserved 1C stack space seems not
> used? why esi is forced to be 512 rather than use input argument?
The JIT allocates a fixed frame on the stack which is used to pass
arguments into stub functions. The 0x1C contains a spare word or two
to maintain stack alignment. %esi is used in the timeout check
> 2.How to understand the stack balance in ctiVMThrowTrampoline()? why
> after calling we still add 1C w/o sub 1C before calling? where comes
> _ZN3JSC11Interpreter12cti_vm_throwEPPv and how do I know which name
> for Mips? does this one relates to variable argument function call?
ctiVMThrowTrampoline is never called as a function (it is declared as
a function only to provide a symbol that can be manipulated from C
code). ctiVMThrowTrampoline is used in returning back from JIT
generated code, in the case of an exception.
> 3.I know how to handle jump in Mips, but not sure how/when to handle
> patchAddress/patchImm/patchPointer because I'm not sure the
> instructions related. I guess all patches are for last 32bit IMM
> field of instructions.
> Mips can't load 32bit in one instruction, thus I need to know the
> instruction before I can patch/add in the 32bit data.
> 4.I'm kind of want no asm code outside <assembler> folder, any plan
> for that?
it's just an assembler. The asm trampolines are specific to the JIT.
It is currently the intention that architecture specific parts of the
JIT implementation will remain in the jit folder.
I'd suggest that in attempting to port the jit, WREC would be a good
place to start.
> --- On Mon, 2/16/09, x yz <lastguy at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> From: x yz <lastguy at yahoo.com>
>> Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] want to port JIT to MIPS - when WREC/JIT
>> To: "Gavin Barraclough" <barraclough at apple.com>
>> Cc: "WebKit Development" <webkit-dev at lists.webkit.org>
>> Date: Monday, February 16, 2009, 5:25 AM
>> from paltform.h it is enabled only on X86 MAC/WIN; from
>> But, from config.log I see them are enabled!
>> how can I run WREC/JIT test so I can trace in X86 asm coce
>> thanks a lot.
>> --- On Sat, 2/7/09, Gavin Barraclough
>> <barraclough at apple.com> wrote:
>>> From: Gavin Barraclough <barraclough at apple.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] want to port JIT to MIPS -
>> using X86::ecx as base
>>> To: lastguy at yahoo.com
>>> Cc: "WebKit Development"
>> <webkit-dev at lists.webkit.org>
>>> Date: Saturday, February 7, 2009, 7:08 AM
>>> On Feb 6, 2009, at 2:52 PM, x yz wrote:
>>>> 1.what's the meaning of ALTERNATE_JSIMMEDIATE
>>> slow case?
>>> On x86-64 we use a different implementation of the
>>> JSImmediate. See JSImmediate.h.
>>> Re 'slow case', in the JIT code generation is
>>> performed as two passes over the bytecode – see
>>> JIT::privateCompileMainPass and
>>>> 2.how come the following code can use ECX as base
>>>> load32(Address(X86::ecx, FIELD_OFFSET(Structure,
>>> m_typeInfo.m_flags)), X86::ecx);
>>>> if the X86::ecx just means its value 1 in ModR/M,
>>> it means [BX+DI]?
>>> I think you're looking at the old 16-bit
>>> mode tables; 32/64-bit x86 can happily encode ecx as a
>>> register. If you're looking at the Intel IA-32
>>> volume 2, see table 2-2 on the next page.
>>>> 3. can anybody help me on my previous questions?
>>> JIT support floating point?
>>> Yes, some. See JITArithmetic.cpp.
>> webkit-dev mailing list
>> webkit-dev at lists.webkit.org
More information about the webkit-dev