[webkit-dev] Adobe Apollo's port of WebKit
chrisb at adobe.com
Thu Mar 22 09:38:40 PDT 2007
I'll go with WebKit/apollo, WebCore/platform/apollo, and WebCore/bridge/apollo, unless I hear otherwise.
Thanks for the feedback,
From: webkit-dev-bounces at lists.webkit.org [mailto:webkit-dev-bounces at lists.webkit.org] On Behalf Of Jean-Charles VERDIE
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 2:48 AM
To: WebKit Development
Subject: Re: [webkit-dev] Adobe Apollo's port of WebKit
Unless some bad things happen between now and then, we will deliver our
"OWBAL" implementation of WebKit, as discussed previously in this
mailing-list. So the question of how to organize new WebKit-based
products is highly interesting to me :-)
>> * Should we make our WebKit a subdirectory in WebKit like
>> WebKit/COM? Should we make a new top level directory?
> I see two options here:
> (1) Fix the WebKit directory to have subdirectories for each
> platform. That means all of the Mac subdirectories would move under
> WebKit/mac. Then you could have WebKit/apollo.
> (2) Have top-level directories for each WebKit, e.g., WebKitMac,
> WebKitWin, WebKitApollo, WebKitQt, etc.
> My personal preference would be for (1), although note that Qt went
> with (2) already. Other platforms can do (1) now without us having to
> move our Mac files immediately, so that doesn't hold anything up.
(1) sounds really good and a clean approach of the multi-target issue, imo.
mobile: +33 (0)6 282 616 05
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev at lists.webkit.org
More information about the webkit-dev