[webkit-changes] [24935] trunk

[Kevin McCullough]

For that decision I will forward you on to Hyatt and Maciej.

 Kevin McCullough
kmccullough at apple.com



On Aug 8, 2007, at 9:53 PM, Alexey Proskuryakov wrote:

> Hi Kevin,
>
>  Thank you for the clarification!
>
>  Do you expect that this will make it to HTML5, or will WebKit be
> non-conformant from the very beginning? HTML5 seems to have a nice  
> model
> (old-style DOM functions always work in HTML namespace), and doesn't  
> have a
> notion of "a Document created with an XHTML MIME type" AFAICT. A  
> real life
> site that breaks on an "isSafari" branch is not a very convincing  
> example.
>
> on 09.08.2007 02:16, Kevin McCullough at kmccullough at apple.com wrote:
>
>> Hi Alexey,
>>     Sorry I wasn't clearer.  I reverted r24146 and added some code so
>> now you will get an XHTML namespace when calling CreateElement if you
>> are an HTMLDocument or a Document created with an XHTML MIME type.
>>
>> I will update the bugs below with this information.  I think 14835  
>> can
>> probably be closed, and the rest just need a comment.  This does fix
>> the given error in 11565 but we are still unable to log into Zimbra
>> for another reason.
>>
>> I think 8007 is where the conversation for this issue should take
>> place.  I'll add a comment.
>>
>>  Kevin McCullough
>> kmccullough at apple.com
>>
>>
>>
>> On Aug 8, 2007, at 1:22 PM, Alexey Proskuryakov wrote:
>>
>>> on 08.08.2007 21:14, kmccullo at webkit.org at kmccullo at webkit.org  
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>      - <rdar://problem/4976879> REGRESSION: Safari doesn't work
>>>> with Zimbra
>>>> enhanced login.
>>>>       - Reverting a previous change, and modifying how documents
>>>> are created
>>>> so that we better match other browsers behavior with respect to
>>>> namespaceURIs.
>>>
>>> What is the new behavior, and is it documented anywhere? It's not
>>> even
>>> quite obvious which previous change was reverted.
>>>
>>> See bugs 8007, 14506, 10932, 14835 - I think some or all of them
>>> may need
>>> to be updated to describe the new behavior.
>>>
>>> +    log("This test was written to address rdar://problem/4976879.
>>> And
>>> tests how namespaceURI's are assigned.");
>>>
>>> Would it be possible to have this bug reflected in Bugzilla, so
>>> that the
>>> rationale would be known? It's good to know the title of the bug,
>>> but maybe
>>> there was some useful information in the report and in subsequent
>>> discussions?
>>>
>>> In particular, I'm wondering if this is in fact a workaround for  
>>> some
>>> broken Safari-specific code in Zimbra (see bug 11565, which is
>>> probably
>>> different, but may be tangentially related).
>>>
>>> - WBR, Alexey Proskuryakov.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> webkit-changes mailing list
>>> webkit-changes at lists.webkit.org
>>> http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-changes
>>
>
> - WBR, Alexey Proskuryakov.
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/webkit-changes/attachments/20070809/d5e9841a/attachment.html