RE: [webkit-dev] Widget / Drawing API thoughts
Hi Maciej,
On Jun 20, 2005, at 3:35 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
[snip]
I was thinking of maybe a tree structure like this
WebCore khtml bridge (stuff from kwq that's for bridging to a higher level API library, not about replacing Qt/KDE) kwq (strictly Qt/KDE replacements) headers common macosx
Then gtk could be added as a peer directory to macosx (and hopefully in the future xwwindows, symbian, win32, and so forth). [snip]
I think this sounds good. Though one little nitpick I have is that I think it's better to name the directories after toolkits rather than platforms. (i.e. cocoa rather than macosx) I think it's a bit clearer, as multiple ports could run on OS X. (Of course, like wxWidgets. ;-) [snip]
For us, we have mostly Symbian dependancies, and very few Series 60 dependancies. So something like: kwq (strictly Qt/KDE replacements) headers common macosx symbian series60 would be better for us. Presently, the series60 directory would be empty. But if the form controls are moved to kwq, and we need some series60 UI widgets, we would put the code in there.
Any thoughts from Nokia folks on how this would affect the Gtk+ or symbian ports?
This directory structure looks fine to us at Nokia. We had actaully already seperated the bridge code some time ago into a different directory. Cheers David Carson
participants (1)
-
David.Carson@nokia.com