On Tuesday 06 December 2005 17:10, Eric Seidel wrote:
As I mentioned in my previous email to Alexey, I think there are smaller, cleaner ways of achieving the same goal.
Unfortunately the "it's hard to merge between khtml" isn't a very strong argument anymore, given how far we've diverged in the last 4.5 years. (RefPtr, #APPLE_CHANGES, JSC gc changes, QualifiedName being just a few on a long list).
The goal here is to make the source as clean and readable as possible. Perhaps then merging at a file-level (as we're currently attempting with kdom/ksvg2) will be a more viable approach.
I don't doubt there's something better. It's just frustrating that we have an initiative to merge things underway and the diff is simultaneously getting larger and larger. -- George Staikos KDE Developer http://www.kde.org/ Staikos Computing Services Inc. http://www.staikos.net/