23 Jan
2006
23 Jan
'06
12:10 a.m.
Hi all, On Jan 20, 2006, at 9:43 PM, Kevin Ollivier wrote: [snip]
In any case, I will try building using the modular DLL option, which builds several smaller libraries instead of one big one (I figure we'll need base, core, and maybe net), and see how much we can trim off the size. I'll report back when I get some hard numbers.
BTW, wanted to let people know that by building smaller libraries, the total dependencies were reduced to ~3.7MB. That's probably about the best we can do without actually having a list of classes we know we won't need. In any case, I guess the first question would be whether or not the added dependency in its current form would be acceptable. Thanks, Kevin