3 Aug
2009
3 Aug
'09
5:09 p.m.
Dne 03.08.2009 (pon) ob 09:51 -0700 je Darin Adler zapisal(a):
On Aug 3, 2009, at 5:00 AM, Luka Napotnik wrote:
In JavaScriptCore/wtf/FastMalloc.cpp:696
The list should be checked for NULL.
No, that’s incorrect. The code is fine as it is. There’s only one caller and that caller guarantees that neither list nor *list is 0. Is there some reason you think this change is necessary?
Oh didn't trace SLL_Pop() back to Pop() to see the ASSERT(). I was just walking the source and noticed.
-- Darin
Greets, Luka