On Sep 23, 2024, at 9:35 AM, Geoff Garen via webkit-dev <webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org> wrote:

+1 for { } because I like catching bugs.

But also: If Chris is right that { } is the only way to handle types without constructors, and the goal is to pick one syntax, then { } is the only possible solution, because standardizing on = would require exceptions for types without constructors.

Thanks,

Geoff

On Sep 20, 2024, at 2:29 PM, Yusuke Suzuki via webkit-dev <webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org> wrote:

I prefer { } style.

It can catch implicit narrowing bugs, which does not work with = style.

Best regards,

- Yusuke

On Sep 19, 2024, at 4:13 PM, Jean-Yves Avenard via webkit-dev <webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org> wrote:



On 20 Sep 2024, at 7:55 AM, Ryosuke Niwa via webkit-dev <webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org> wrote:

Should we do:

struct Foo {

    int bar = 0;

}

Or

struct Foo {

    int bar { 0 };

}

We do both at the moment.

- R. Niwa

I think `int bar = 0` reads better.

I only ever see (and use) { } and I thought that was the proper coding style.

I’m surprised it’s not in our guidelines. 

Jean-Yves

_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev

_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev

_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev