The Surfin&#39; Safari blog seems to have fairly wide readership in the web dev community. Google Reader reports 35k Reader subscribers. For comparison: <a href="http://blog.chromium.org" target="_blank">blog.chromium.org</a> has 17k and <a href="http://blog.mozilla.com" target="_blank">blog.mozilla.com</a> has 10k. However, the last post with descriptive content was back on April 18th. Since that post, we&#39;ve written 8 &quot;X is a now a WebKit reviewer&quot; posts. One recent commenter said:<div>


<br><i>&quot;I don’t suppose there’s anything more interesting going on in WebKit land worth blogging about, is there? So-and-so is a new WebKit reviewer isn’t nearly as interesting as whatever new hotness is coming down the pipe. And I know I’m not the only one who thinks so… Feel like blogging about WebKit awesomeness?&quot;</i><br>


<br>I propose we increase the amount of blogging about WebKit awesomeness by changing the tradition for new reviewer posts.<br><br>Instead of defaulting to:<br><br><b>  So-and-so is now a WebKit reviewer</b><br><i>  Posted by Someone-else<br>


  So-and-so has worked on awesome-feature or awesome-infrastructure...</i><br><br>We encourage (or just allow?) a format more like:<br><br></div><div><b>  How awesome-infrastructure works</b><br><i>  Posted by So-and-so, the latest WebKit reviewer<br>


  Here&#39;s my description of how awesome-infrastructure works in WebKit...</i></div><div><i><br></i></div><div><i><span style="font-style:normal">  -OR-<br></span></i></div><div><i><br></i><b>  Awesome-feature is the new hotness</b><br>


<i>  Posted by So-and-so, the latest WebKit reviewer<br>  Web developers can now use awesome-feature. Here&#39;s how it works...</i><br><br><div>Thoughts?</div></div><div><br></div><div>-Tony</div>