Hi It’s a very strong +1 for me ; I find the usage of foo->protectedBar()->method() or Ref { foo->bar() }->method() particularly unsightly (and points more to the inability of the static analyser to deal with some use case than the code being inherently unsafe) Having a way to reduce the unsightly pattern where we are 100% certain it’s not needed is a benefit. I assume also that the static analyser will not complain with `const` members either (For the sake of disclosure, I asked Ryosuke for that feature after discussing the need with Youenn) Jean-Yves
On 29 Oct 2024, at 5:48 am, Ryosuke Niwa via webkit-dev <webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org> wrote:
Hi all,
In WebKit, it’s fairly common to write a member variable as RefPtr or std::unique_ptr that later gets lazily initialized to some value but never unset or assigned of a different value after that.
e.g.
class Foo { Bar& bar() { if (!m_bar) m_bar = Bar::create(); return *m_bar; } Ref<Bar> protectedBar() { return bar(); }
RefPtr<Bar> m_bar; }
Assuming there is no other code modifying m_bar, foo->bar()->method() is always safe to call even if method wasn’t a trivial function. Right now, static analyzer doesn’t recognize this pattern so we’d be forced to write code like this: foo->protectedBar()->method() where ensureProtectedBar is a wrapper around ensureBar which returns Ref<Bar>.
A suggestion was made that static analyzer can recognize this patten. Specifically, if we introduced a new smart pointer types that only allow setting the value once, static analyzer can allow foo->bar()->method()and avoid ref-churn in some cases:
e.g.
class Foo { Bar& bar() { if (!m_bar) m_bar = Bar::create(); return *m_bar; }
SetOnceRefPtr<Bar> m_bar; }
SetOnceRefPtr::operator=(T*) release asserts that m_ptr isn’t set, and doesn’t have a move constructor, operator=(nullptr_t), leakRef(), releaseNonNull(), etc… which can override the value of m_ptr after setting the value via operator= or in constructor.
We could create various variants: SetOnceRef, SetOnceUniquePtr, SetOnceUniqueRef.
Do you think this will be useful?
- R. Niwa
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev