November 2022 - webkit-dev - lists.webkit.org

InjectedBundle deprecation
by Alex Christensen 01 Aug '25

01 Aug '25

Hello WebKit developers! We are ramping up to do some serious work on Site Isolation which includes putting cross-origin iframes in a different process than the parent frame. Similar efforts have been done in other browser engines and some related work has already been done in WebKit, but not enough. This will do strange things to the InjectedBundle APIs, which have fundamental assumptions that the whole DOM is in one process and that communication only happens with one process at a time. We have never exposed InjectedBundle APIs as public API, but some other distributors of WebKit have. As we make progress on this project, we anticipate that anything in Source/WebKit/WebProcess/InjectedBundle/API is subject to deprecation and removal. This will also allow us to tighten the sandbox on the web process, resolve security and performance issues, and have cleaner code. Would the maintainers of the GTK and WPE APIs be willing to assist in migrating from those APIs and designing replacements in the UI process? Alex Christensen

5 17

WebKit Documentation
by Brandon Stewart 16 Mar '23

16 Mar '23

Hi WebKit Developers, Documentation is an important part of any open source project, especially for a larger project like WebKit. Being able to ramp up during the onboarding process, reading up on architectural decisions, and learning how to perform common procedures are all features the documentation should tackle. WebKit has a large set of documentation already, but it is scattered around a wide range of platforms (Trac, GitHub Wiki, markdown files in the code, Git commits, etc...), and some of the information is out of date. A few months ago, I started working on a new documentation solution based on the DocC documentation framework. This provides an easy way to add and edit documentation through markdown files. I have already ported a large section of Trac, all of the GitHub Wiki, and all of the non third party markdown files in the code over to this platform. I have tested this on macOS and Linux and have found it works extremely well. (Windows should be able to use WSL2 at the moment, while a few remaining issues get sorted out). The only dependency for this project is a recent installation of Swift. You can already download the documentation and preview it locally, but we are looking to publish it online for easy viewing. We were looking to get your feedback if we would want to publish the documentation on GitHub Pages or webkit.org. The documentation source can be found at https://github.com/webkit/documentation. - Brandon

13 22

Smart Pointer Analysis Tool for WebKit
by Ryosuke Niwa 01 Mar '23

01 Mar '23

Hi all, I’ve been working with Geoff (ggaren) and Jan Korous from Apple's compiler team to create a static analyzer which detects dangerous use of ref counted objects, and we’re looking for folks who are interested in trying out this tool and helping us refine the tool. Please let me know if you’re interested in using this tool & try applying code changes to WebKit. Our goal is to eventually integrate this tool into buildbot and EWS so that we can catch dangerous code before they get committed. *What is Dangerous?* So *what is* a *dangerous* use of ref counted objects you may ask? It’s any use of which we can’t trivially conclude that it doesn’t lead to a use-after-free. For now, we don’t detect dangerous use of non-ref counted objects including ones that can vend WeakPtr. It’s on us, humans, to decide which objects need to be ref counted or need to be CanMakeWeakPtr. Consider the following example. This code most certainly will lead to a use-after-free of “parent” in the third line because the code doesn’t keep the parent alive. Because isContentEditable updates style in some cases, it could lead to arbitrary script execution which could remove the parent from the document. Node* parent = element->parentElement(); if (parent->isContentEditable()) parent->scrollIntoView(); In general, relying on a complex data structure such as DOM tree to keep RefCounted objects alive while we call a non-trivial function is not safe. All it takes for the code to have a use-after-free is for someone to start updating style, layout, etc… inside the function either directly or indirectly. And we don’t want to make WebKit development really hard by forcing anyone who modifies a function to check every caller of the function and their callers, etc… to make sure it’s safe to do so. For this reason, it’s *dangerous* to store a raw pointer or a reference to a ref counted object as a local variable and use it after calling a non-trivial function. We did a similar analysis of a number of other patterns and usage of ref counted objects in WebKit and came up with the following basic rules for using ref counted objects in a safe manner. We’re hoping that these rules would be eventually incorporated into our coding style guideline: https://webkit.org/code-style-guidelines/ *Rules for Using Ref Counted Objects* 1. Every data member to a ref counted object must use either Ref, RefPtr, or WeakPtr. webkit.NoUncountedMemberChecker <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/master/clang/docs/analyzer/checke…> 2. Every ref counted base class, if it has a derived class, must define a virtual destructor. webkit.RefCntblBaseVirtualDtor <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/master/clang/docs/analyzer/checke…> 3. Every ref counted object passed to a non-trivial function as an argument (including "this" pointer) should be stored as a Ref or RefPtr in the caller’s local scope unless it's an argument to the caller itself by transitive property [1]. alpha.webkit.UncountedCallArgsChecker <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/master/clang/docs/analyzer/checke…> 4. Every ref counted object must be captured using Ref or RefPtr for lambda. webkit.UncountedLambdaCapturesChecker <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/master/clang/docs/analyzer/checke…> 5. Local variables - we’re still working on this ( https://reviews.llvm.org/D83259) Below, I've dissected each one of these rules with the real warning emitted by the analysis tool in development. Please let me know if you have any comments / concerns. ------------------------------ (1) is pretty trivial. Every ref counted data member should be stored using Ref, RefPtr, or WeakPtr since it would be not trivially obvious that life cycles of two or more objects are correctly tied or managed together. ------------------------------ (2) is also pretty easy to understand. In the following example, if someone destroys an instance of B using Ref<A>, then it would result in an undefined behavior. struct A : public RefCounted<A> { Vector<int> someData; }; struct B : public A { Vector<int> otherData; }; ------------------------------ For (3), passing a ref counted object as a raw pointer or reference to a function as an argument, the tool may generate a warning like this: Source/WebCore/html/FormAssociatedElement.cpp:181:13: warning: [WebKit] call argument is a raw pointers to a ref-countable type [-Wfunction-arg-ptr-to-refcntbl] setForm(findAssociatedForm(&asHTMLElement(), originalForm.get())); ^ This warns that void setForm(HTMLFormElement*) is called with the result of findAssociatedForm, which returns HTMLFormElement* without storing it anywhere. If setForm can somehow cause HTMLFormElement to be deleted, then this can result in the use-after-free in setForm. void FormAssociatedElement::resetFormOwner() { RefPtr<HTMLFormElement> originalForm = m_form.get(); setForm(findAssociatedForm(&asHTMLElement(), originalForm.get())); HTMLElement& element = asHTMLElement(); auto* newForm = m_form.get(); if (newForm && newForm != originalForm && newForm->isConnected()) element.document().didAssociateFormControl(element); } Why, you may ask, we don't put HTMLFormElement* in a Ref or RefPtr in setForm instead? This is because a lot of code has calls to a function with a local variable. Because the callee doesn’t know whether the caller has already stored each argument in Ref / RefPtr or not, we need to be safe and store them again in Ref / RefPtr, resulting in an unnecessary ref-churn. Additionally, if we took the approach of the callee being responsible for keeping every argument alive, then every non-trivial member function of a ref counted object must have "protectedThis" at the beginning of the function, which would be particularly wasteful if those member functions are sometimes called by other member functions. Once this rule is applied everywhere, for example, we can get rid of “protectedThis” from our codebase because it would be redundant. Furthermore, this rule transitively allows a raw pointer or a reference passed in as an argument to be used as arguments to call another function without storing it in Ref or RefPtr. For example, the following function satisfies this rule because both oldDocument and newDocument are raw references passed to this function as arguments, and therefore the caller of this function must have already stored as Ref / RefPtr as local variables. void HTMLMediaElement::didMoveToNewDocument(Document& oldDocument, Document& newDocument) { ASSERT_WITH_SECURITY_IMPLICATION(&document() == &newDocument); if (m_shouldDelayLoadEvent) { oldDocument.decrementLoadEventDelayCount(); newDocument.incrementLoadEventDelayCount(); } unregisterWithDocument(oldDocument); registerWithDocument(newDocument); HTMLElement::didMoveToNewDocument(oldDocument, newDocument); updateShouldAutoplay(); } ------------------------------ For (4), capturing a ref counted object as a raw pointer or a reference, the tool may generate a warning like this: Source/WebKit/UIProcess/API/APIHTTPCookieStore.cpp:115:74: warning: [WebKit] captured a raw pointer to a ref-countable type [-Wlambda-capture-ptr-to-refcntbl] cookieManager->deleteCookie(m_owningDataStore->sessionID(), cookie, [pool = WTFMove(pool), completionHandler = WTFMove(completionHandler)]() mutable { ^ This is warning about webPage object getting captured using a raw reference in the following function: void HTTPCookieStore::deleteCookie(const WebCore::Cookie& cookie, CompletionHandler<void()>&& completionHandler) { auto* pool = m_owningDataStore->processPoolForCookieStorageOperations(); if (!pool) { if (m_owningDataStore->sessionID() == PAL::SessionID::defaultSessionID() && !cookie.session) deleteCookieFromDefaultUIProcessCookieStore(cookie); else m_owningDataStore->removePendingCookie(cookie); RunLoop::main().dispatch([completionHandler = WTFMove(completionHandler)] () mutable { completionHandler(); }); return; } auto* cookieManager = pool->supplement<WebKit::WebCookieManagerProxy>(); cookieManager->deleteCookie(m_owningDataStore->sessionID(), cookie, [pool = WTFMove(pool), completionHandler = WTFMove(completionHandler)]() mutable { completionHandler(); }); } Here, we should have stored WebProcessPool in Ref instead. - R. Niwa

9 17

Update commit log template to make GNU changelog optional
by Michael Catanzaro 02 Dec '22

02 Dec '22

Hi, I'd like to remove the GNU changelog from the bottom of the commit messages by default. With "by default" I mean people who prefer to use the GNU changelog for formatting their commit messages would have to change git-webkit configuration to keep using it, and it would go away for everyone else's commit messages. I don't see any reason to prohibit the changelogs if really desired, but these were designed for an era before version control existed, to explain what is being changed rather than why. The freeform commit message that we add above the changelogs is usually a better way to explain commits. (Another disadvantage is it is really easy for the changelog to become stale by mistake. When amending commits, you have to look closely at the bottom of the commit message template prepared by git-webkit to notice the updated changelog, then manually replace the original commit message's changelog. I'm sure we commit inaccurate changelogs all the time because we forget to do this.) Michael

2 1

Remove the version labels in GitHub
by Darin Adler 21 Nov '22

21 Nov '22

Hi folks. I understand it can be super critical to understand what version someone was testing when reporting a WebKit bug. But I, at least, haven’t found the version field at bugs.webkit.org useful in the 20+ years I have been working on this project. Now we have that same noise in GitHub. All my pull requests have the label WebKit Nightly Build on them when I use the “git webkit pr” command to create them. And we have lots of labels with various version numbers, such as “Safari 8” and “417.x". Can we just get rid of all this? Is there anyone who’s finding these labels useful in GitHub? I suggest we remove these labels from the project. No objections to leaving the version field in bugs.webkit.org for the time being, but eventually I think we should probably get rid of that too. — Darin

5 8

Update commit log template to add placeholder for explanation of why a patch fixes a bug
by David Kilzer 18 Nov '22

18 Nov '22

Hi, The following PR adds placeholder text in the commit log template to remind authors to explain why a change fixes a bug: Bug 248012: Update commit message template to request a brief explanation of why a PR fixes the bug <https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=248012 <https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=248012>> <https://github.com/WebKit/WebKit/pull/6579 <https://github.com/WebKit/WebKit/pull/6579>> It looks like this: Need a short description (OOPS!). Need the bug URL (OOPS!). Include a Radar link (OOPS!). Reviewed by NOBODY (OOPS!). Short explanation why this fixes the bug (OOPS!). * path/to/File.cpp: (Method::Name): Since this is effectively a policy change, Jonathan suggested I post it here first before the change is landed. I believe many WebKit contributors already do this anyway, and it’s always been a best-practice to explain why a change fixes a bug (vs. what a patch does, which is usually obvious by reading the code), so this text just serves as a reminder to write a short explanation for every relevant patch. Note that the line may be simply be deleted when it doesn’t apply (such as gardening, a build fix, etc.). Any feedback on this change? Dave

5 9

GPU Process on all platforms eventually?
by Alex Christensen 16 Nov '22

16 Nov '22

I remember several years ago there was a configuration to run WebKit2 without a network process, which was eventually removed. Given the current work to make the GPU Process on more platforms, is there an agreement that eventually (like in a year or two or three) all platforms running WebKit should have a GPU Process? It is a considerable security improvement, a lot of work is being done to support it, and I imagine there will come a point when we don’t want to support all the code and abstractions needed to have a configuration with a GPU Process and a configuration without, but to get there we would need consensus of some sort.

5 4