<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.webkit.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Atomics are unavailable without the COOP/COEP headers"
href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=243342#c6">Comment # 6</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Atomics are unavailable without the COOP/COEP headers"
href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=243342">bug 243342</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:cdumez@apple.com" title="Chris Dumez <cdumez@apple.com>"> <span class="fn">Chris Dumez</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Geoffrey Garen from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=243342#c5">comment #5</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to Chris Dumez from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=243342#c4">comment #4</a>)
> > + a few JSC people: Did we intentionally disable Atomics due to Spectre? I
> > assume we did.
>
> My understanding is that the Spectre risk comes from shared memory, not from
> atomics. So, enabling just Atomics without shared memory should be fine. Of
> course, it's also useless. Which is why it's fine.
>
> But if enabling Atomics improves interop, it seems worth doing, even if it's
> useless as a programming model.</span >
👍</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>